Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] WAS: New PAW.......... NOW OLD WOMEN. ;-)
From: tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant)
Date: Sat Oct 30 22:30:23 2004
References: <002001c4bef9$66566a50$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <001601c4bf04$530cd1e0$87d86c18@ted>

BD posted: a new paw:
http://gallery.leica-users.org/TED-SANDY/A304325
I guess he needed more caffeine.. ;-)<<<<<<


Ted Grant inadvertently responded! :-(
> Sandy will have a bird with comments about looking old! as all women do 
> anyway! :-)<,,

This is / was a big typo error!! Watch me try to save my ass right now. ;-)

I didn't mean all women look old! ;-) Like I didn't mean they all look old 
or are old, particularly Sandy! :-). Nor heaven forbid, just imagine if "she 
who must be obeyed" knew I'd said what I said, about being old or looked 
old, this would be my very last post on the LUG as the bugler played the 
"Last Post" over my remains! ;-)

So to all the ladies I didn't mean any of you were or are old, it was a 
senior moment of mental slippage! :-) Honest. :-)

I wonder should I stop before I dig myself in deeper? ;-)

Oh well what the hell I can only die once! :-) :-)

But then in my error I was referring to women, so to get really even they'd 
have me reincarnated just so they could get even twice and knock me off a 
second time to make sure I got the message they were, shall we say, "ticked 
off?" ;-)

ted





In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] New PAW)
Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] New PAW)