Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I don't think that Voigtlander sales are necessarily hurting Leica. I would bet that much of the Voigtlander market is for those just entering rangefinder territory who aren't going to drop $2,500 for a body and another $1,200 - $2,000 for a lens. If Voigtlander were not available, they would be buying used Leica (which benefits DAG and Sherry...I hope that doesn't make them anti-Leica too). Ultimately, truly satisfied and productive Voigtlander users start buying Leica glass of some kind, and maybe a Leica body or two. I'm all for people having a choice. But I think that Canon SLRs and just about everything digital is putting the squeeze on Leica, not Stephen Gandy selling cameras and lenses out of the guest bedroom. I, for one, like the idea of fewer middlemen. Now, when the Zeiss Ikon comes out, you'll have Cosina, Zeiss, Hasselblad, and B&H making a profit before it lands in the customer's hands. Hmmm....too many middlemen! ;-) Jeffery Smith New Orleans, LA -----Original Message----- > It's the beast 666 antiLeica! > > I believe such commercial stance should be at least alluded to in a post > like this. > > Mark Rabiner > Photography > Portland Oregon > http://rabinergroup.com/