Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: rd-1 tests
From: lenniefalcon at cclmgmt.com (lennie falcon)
Date: Thu Oct 14 04:44:41 2004

i neglected to mention that the focussing cam on the rd-1 was very 
imprecise. with a stiff focussing (new) helical it compounds the problem. 
the electronics of the rd-1 are good, but the rf is another story. it has  
the feel of the early russian knockoffs of the III series leicas-ought to 
work, but not quite! question is: do you really want to spend $2500+ on an 
un-refined copy camera?
falcon 
>
>Message: 13
>Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:42:51 -0700
>From: "lennie falcon" <lenniefalcon@cclmgmt.com>
>Subject: [Leica] Re: rd1 tests
>To: <lug@leica-users.org>
>Message-ID: <200410131642.AA2352414772@cclmgmt.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>i tested the rd1 for a day with the new m 50 1.4 in germany at photokina.
>the raw files exhibited limited dynamic range as tiffs. although when the 
>light is well balanced the files are very sharp, the colours are extremely 
>accurate and the dynamic range seems less of a problem. you have to be a 
>photoshop wizz with very low or extremely contrasted lighting. you can get 
>an excellent 12x18 with minimum effort utilizing 200 asa and tiff files. 
>the camera focus with the new summilux was very stiff and slow, so one can 
>not assume leica lenses will work as well with real m's.
>i'll try it again next week with a 28mm summicron and put the files out for 
>comment. the properties of the new 50 summilux are almost essential in low 
>light.
>t.t.f.n.,
>falcon
> 
>
>

>
>Message: 28
>Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 17:34:39 -0700
>From: "Frank Filippone" <red735i@earthlink.net>
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: rd1 tests
>To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
>Message-ID: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNIEGDAGAB.red735i@earthlink.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain;      charset="US-ASCII"
>
>The body has nothing to do with the focusing helix..... why would the choice
>of a Leica or an Epson body present a different resistance to focusing?  Do
>I misunderstand the statement?  Is this a RF/VF issue of ease of focus?
>
>Frank Filippone
>red735i@earthlink.net
>
> the camera focus with the new summilux was very stiff and slow, so one can
>not assume leica lenses will work as well with real m's.
>
>------------------------------



___________________________________________________________
$0 Web Hosting with up to 120MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com


Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Re: rd-1 tests)
Reply from thlrlgrp at mac.com (Mike Cahill) ([Leica] Re: rd-1 tests)