Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Don's PAW You did want images taken with the 75Summiluxdidn't you?
From: dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory)
Date: Sat Oct 9 15:33:04 2004

Phong,
In this case, where I focused depended on whether my daughter had the
near eye covered.  If the near eye was covered then the far eye won.

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of Phong
Sent: Saturday, October 09, 2004 2:56 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: RE: [Leica] Don's PAW You did want images taken with the
75Summiluxdidn't you?

Don Dory posted:
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/75-Summilux/maryvertiiclebenchhead
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/75-Summilux/maryhorizontalearly
> http://gallery.leica-users.org/75-Summilux/maryvertearly

All great shots, Don, 75 Summilux or not.
The interesting thing is that in all 3 shots, the far
eye seems a tad sharper than the near eye.
It could very well be just an illusion, with shooting
from the shadow side, leaving the far eye
in brighter light, and hence appearing sharper.
Do you remember if you focused on the far eye ?

- Phong

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



In reply to: Message from phong at doan-ltd.com (Phong) ([Leica] Don's PAW You did want images taken with the 75 Summiluxdidn't you?)