Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Extra photo bag on the plane
From: jplaurel at nwlink.com (Jim Laurel)
Date: Thu Oct 7 12:09:32 2004
References: <BAY3-F12wFCHOzyfyz5000078e3@hotmail.com>

This is the answer that makes the most sense to me.  If the airlines 
and airport facilities cannot guarantee that my checked baggage is not 
lost or pilfered, how can any seriously believe that they are really 
taking adequate precautions against terrorist threats?

--Jim

On Oct 7, 2004, at 11:18 AM, Mark Davison wrote:

> The long term answer is better property security for checked luggage, 
> meaning that the airlines take on full responsibility for replacement 
> value insurance, plus a hefty fine. If they cannot secure our luggage 
> in transit, I don't think they can actually secure the airliners 
> against terrorists planting things.
>
> Mark Davison


In reply to: Message from mark_e_davison at msn.com (Mark Davison) ([Leica] Extra photo bag on the plane)