Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Ain't nothing wrong with that "cheaper" Rolleiflex-T :) Better egonomics, they say the Tessar has been improved. It still goes "click". As you say ... everything on a Rollei is reliable and the T is a Rollei. Better shutter release design too. You can't tell the difference in a photograph taken with a Rolleicord, Rolleiflex, A-F or T. Rollei quality the whole way. Daniel On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 Summicron1@aol.com wrote: > the latter day rolleiflex cameras that lacked the automat feature were the > Rolleiflex-T models -- cheaper versions. > > the automat feature on mine never goes bad, although i suppose it could, > but > it's pretty reliable, as is everything on a rollei since they're as well > made > as leicas. > c trentelman > In a message dated 10/3/04 7:08:42 AM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: > > > > > > I suppose that feature is nice. But for me, it's just one more thing that > > could go wrong (haven't heard anything about it going wrong though). I > > sure wouldn't classify true Rolleiflexes according to them having that > > feature or not. A new Rolleiflex made this year or last year? You bet! > > It's the: > > > > 1) Glass > > 2) The quiet "click" > > > > that matters to me. They're beautiful boxes. Love'em. > > > > Daniel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >