Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Bob, Sure, there are many possibilities, but that is also the case with conventional images. You can develop the film in different ways, you can print the negatives on different papers etc. The beauty of RAW is that you can "undo" these decisions if they do not work out. Personally, I keep the manipulation to a minimum--when converting from RAW I just make sure that the histogram is not clipped at either end, and then I do the same modest unsharp masking and levels adjustments that I also do with scanned film. Nathan Robert D. Baron wrote: > Tina Manley wrote: > >> This is one of the most exciting things about using RAW. You can >> develop the "negative" any way want but you still have the original to >> develop again another way! The only problem is that there are too >> many options to try and not enough time! > > > This to me encapsulates a central problem I have working with digital > (or digitized) images in Photoshop. The possibilities for adjustment > (tweaking) of the image are so infinite that it is hard to know when to > stop. > > --Bob > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > -- Nathan Wajsman Almere, The Netherlands General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com