Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Brian Reid wrote: >"Google spends a lot of money trying to prevent "google" from being used as >a verb. Their attorneys believe that the NPR piece mentioned was the first, >but there were several at that time, including a reference in Sex and the >City, the first on mainstream television." Omigawd, yes. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3006486.stm Reminds me of the time in the '80s when I worked for a few months at a Certain Large Software Company which shall be referred to euphemistically. I was documenting new edition of an already popular symbolic code debugger for yet another computer language. One of my cardinal principles as a tech writer is to write plain English, eschewing obfuscatory technobabble and geekspeak. I made the mistake of referring to the product by name. I wrote things like, "...when you press the "R" key, CodeCrunch will run the program." My boss quickly told me that Legal said it was absolutely a no-go, and could jeopardize the company's trademark. I was henceforth instructed, commanded, and compelled, now and in perpetuity, to refer to their valuable intellectual property as "the Macroswift (TM) CodeCrunch (TM) Debugger." In every single use of the name, except for the title. At which point the size of my manual increased by about 15%, and the nice, high Readability Index I had attained plummeted. The fact that everybody in the software development world already called it simply CodeCrunch made no difference. Oh, and back then I shot with a Leica IIIf. --Peter