Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] new 1ds mark II
From: locke at straylight.ca (Greg Locke)
Date: Tue Sep 21 15:48:37 2004

In the reproduction and printing press world  the higher end magazines and
publications need 450 dpi (due to presses that do more than 4 colour process
now) at a given size.
My Nikon D100 gives me 10 X 6.5 inches at 300 dpi from it 6MP chip.
Dirty math tells me that 5X7 is the maximum size I can get if 450 dpi is the
minimum resolution permitted.

The 5 or 6 assignments I shot on film since last August were for
publications that fell into this category.

...hence more pixels DO MEAN better quality to these publications.

But you are right. This is a high end pro thing and something no hobbyist
(or most pros for that matter) would ever need.

Right now I would be happy with a 6-8MP full 35mm chip in a manual
rangefinder that mounted Leica glass :^)

...or have we discussed this one already?


Greg Locke
St. John's, Newfoundland
http://blog.greglocke.com

> So maybe the truth is, a 5-8 mgp is just fine for 99.9% of 
> us, so why are people knocking their brains out being sucked 
> into the larger is better mgp myth when you can't see the difference?
> 
> ted
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 


In reply to: Message from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] new 1ds mark II)