Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 10:50, B. D. Colen wrote: > Well, Feli, think about this for a minute - For 8K you get a 16.7 mp > FULL frame, 4 fps, autofocus, full featured camera that can use the vast > array of Canon AF lenses and all accessories; and for , what, 6K you get > an R9 with an add-on digital back that is NOT full frame, has a, what, > 10-11? Mgp sensor, is manual focus only - and you are in all seriousness > saying that the Canon is expensive? Get a grip, man! If the Leica price > is reasonable, then you have to say that Canon is GIVING that beast > away! :-) Expensive for little old me, mon a mi. 8-) $8000 bucks for the body, plus $2000 for the 24-70/2.8 L and 1.4/50. Then you'll need a pile of CF cards, so figure another $1500, plus $1000 for disk space to get the ball rolling. That's a lot of cash. Now, if it was $4500 and I made a living as a photographer and had to shoot digital I would be tempted. To me the Digital-R back really only makes sense if you have a lot of money invested in R glass/bodies and I only own the humble 2/50 Summicron for my R6.2 and SL. ;-) Feli