Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/15
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:06, Slobodan Dimitrov wrote: > I'm sure many still feel Tri-X is the cat's meow. > This past week I had to print material from as far back as twenty+ years, > ranging from Ilford, Kodak, to Freestyle house brand, along with Neopan. > It just reinforced how much I liked the look of a print from a Neopan neg. > On the other hand, Neopan in 120 is about as atrocious as the Freestyle > brand. 120 Acros is fine, but impossible to get handily, making T-max the > best bet. > S. Dimitrov What differences are you seeing between Neopan and Tri-X? I have read that the grain is a little finer and it has a little more shadow detail, but the highlights are more linear. I'm very curious. I love Tri-X, but sometimes wish for a traditional style 400 film with finer grain. Feli