Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Canon 135/3.5 lens
From: nicholsj at (JAMES NICHOLS)
Date: Wed Sep 15 08:37:41 2004

I have an Imarect finder and have used it a few times with a 135.  The main
objection is that it simply masks down the field of view to show you what
you will get with the focal length selected, so, when it gets to the 135,
the image is very small.  However, with the parallax correction set
correctly, you get what you see.
Jim Nichols

> [Original Message]
> From: Kenneth Frazier <>
> To: Leica Users Group <>
> Date: 9/14/2004 5:18:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon 135/3.5 lens
> > The cheapest alternative is the russian turret finder (about $35 on
> > e*ay)  which allows to see what's outside the 135-frame (what I 
> > appreciate 
> What about the Leitz Imarect finder?  Aside from cost, probably, is it
> as usable as the russian turret finder?
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See for more information

Replies: Reply from mail at (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Canon 135/3.5 lens)
Reply from kennybod at (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Canon 135/3.5 lens)