Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Hi all, Having followed the underexposure and the B&W conversion topics, I started reading a bit more about it on the net. At first, I did my conversions in PS CS from RGB to greyscale. Then I was pointed by B.D. towards the conversion option in "actions" + the unsharp mask step (settings: amount 10 to 15%,radius 65, treshold 0 px) Later I heard about the Fred Miranda Plugin, that I bought and started using, too. IME results got significantly better. Especially after the initial conversion when playing with the curves to enhance contrasts, and/or to darken or lighten the image (could also be parts of the image, imitating wet darkroom techniques). What I also do is "selecting color range" for the blacks and whites, feathering it to 20 pixels, inverting it and adding 0,5 to 2% of noise (gaussian, NOT monochromatic). This adds a (IME) nice grain to the image, without the selected zones: the whites and the blacks stay clean this way. I never did the channel mixing method, but I suspect the Fred Miranda Plugin (BW Workflow Pro) is doing that for me. Now I found something stupidly simple: the RGB to Lab to greyscale method. Once converted to Lab, playing around with the levels (especially the level of "Lightness") crisps up the image significantly. A simple conversion to greyscale turns it into quite good B&W. So this might be a (very easy) technique to consider in some cases. I will post an image (D2, lens equivalent of 80mm focal length, diaphragm wide open, auto exposure with times around 1/6th unpulled or pushed, shot in RGB RAW mode in (very) low light conditions) + the different conversion methods shortly, for debate for those whom it might concern. Greetings from Belgium, Philippe Orlent