Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Tue Sep 7 16:56:14 2004
References: <BD624BDB.5A91%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1094578985.4848.149.camel@failsafe> <413E04DF.6070402@planet.nl>

Nathan:

>My choice is Neopan 1600 processed in XTOL or Fuji developer.

I concur with Neopan 1600 in Xtol.  Love the tones.  Love the grain of
Neopan 400 better, though.  Better grain than no shot, though.  :)

What's the main difference you've seen between Neopan in Xtol and in the
Fuji developer?

--
Eric
http://canid.com/


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] The Ted Grant Discovery.)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)