Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200
From: ericm at (Eric)
Date: Tue Sep 7 16:56:14 2004
References: <> <1094578985.4848.149.camel@failsafe> <>


>My choice is Neopan 1600 processed in XTOL or Fuji developer.

I concur with Neopan 1600 in Xtol.  Love the tones.  Love the grain of
Neopan 400 better, though.  Better grain than no shot, though.  :)

What's the main difference you've seen between Neopan in Xtol and in the
Fuji developer?


Replies: Reply from bdcolen at (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] The Ted Grant Discovery.)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
In reply to: Message from mark at (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from feli at (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
Message from nathan.wajsman at (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)