Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/09/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Tue Sep 7 16:56:14 2004
References: <BD624BDB.5A91%mark@rabinergroup.com> <1094578985.4848.149.camel@failsafe> <413E04DF.6070402@planet.nl>
Nathan:
>My choice is Neopan 1600 processed in XTOL or Fuji developer.
I concur with Neopan 1600 in Xtol. Love the tones. Love the grain of
Neopan 400 better, though. Better grain than no shot, though. :)
What's the main difference you've seen between Neopan in Xtol and in the
Fuji developer?
--
Eric
http://canid.com/
Replies:
Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] The Ted Grant Discovery.)
Reply from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Re: I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
In reply to:
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] INCORRECTLY R.I.P. ILFORD)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)
Message from nathan.wajsman at planet.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] I R.I.P. ILFORD now Delta3200)