Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Why do you think he put the model in the photo? To distract you,
obviously, so you would not see the string. by the way, the distraction
works very well. ;-)
Gene
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
| | Sam <sam@osheaven.net> |
| | Sent by: |
| | lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic|
| | a-users.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 03/23/2004 11:24 AM |
| | Please respond to Leica Users Group |
| | |
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: Re: [Leica] no shadows on kyle's photo?
|
>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
You have utterly ruined the magic for me, Mr. Show-it-all. I believed my
fellow man when I was told everything was as it was--no tricks involved.
Why would I disbelieve? Yes, of course the fact of there being occult
artifacts pictured gave me pause, but I thought the better and said to
myself, "They are just props." I should have suspected you, Cassidy. You
and all those cat pictures. I'm not a man to throw out facts to injure,
but Lizzy Borden was a cat lover too, you know--
'Lizzy Borden took an ax and gave her mother forty whacks, when she saw
what she had done, she gave her father forth-one.'
Sam S
Kyle Cassidy wrote:
>gene sed:
>
>
>
>>Did not see the notes at the bottom, but still not convinced.
>>The board should have a prominent shadow either just left or
>>below the picture on the wall and I don't see it.
>>Either way a neat shot.
>>
>>
>
>i hope you're not analyzing UFO photos for the government.
>
>here's a closeup.
>
>http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/temp/um.jpg
>
>this was during setup, which was probably 2 hours before the photo was
shot,
>but whatever photos are supposed to be there are there.
>
>kc
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information