Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: ruben at rhodos.dk (Ruben)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:19 2004
References: <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <OFEA8DEA9A.3EB2048F-ON86256E5A.0005E338-86256E5A.00061C45@crnotes2.rockwe llcollins.com> <A5DEF66C-77D9-11D8-9214-000A95CD9BF8@mac.com> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <4058B1FA.2090906@osheaven.net> <p05100330bc7e6c8272cb@[10.0.1.3]> <4058EC9F.6050301@osheaven.net> <p05100304bc7eedb41522@[10.0.1.4]>

Sam/Henning
Would it have been possible to have 4 brands, canon, nikon, minolta and
pentax + leica and contax compeeting for the professional market? If there
is only sold one hundred 1200 mm.* tele optics a year and the same one
hundred should be devided among 6 camera makers delivering goods for the pro
market that would make sixteen pieces a year eacg and that would not give
much back to the research/developement departments of these companys?!
(*and likewise with T&SH lenses and other special lenses)
Its happening with mediumformat to - Bronica, Yasica and Mamiya is out
leaving the market to Rollie and Hasselblad and perhaps Fuji. There will be
feinscmecher brands like Silvestri, Alpo and Lindhoff but they do not depend
on their own lenses, so perhaps Minolta and Pentax did the right thing when
then pulled out of the pro-market and instead was content with providing the
amateurm arket with som really competent equipment?
Anyway even Nikon is loosing terrain to Canon, so the future pro 35mm/11-14
Mpix market might just have one player left in a couple of years? - sad
though


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Henning Wulff" <henningw@archiphoto.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples


> At 7:26 PM -0500 3/17/04, Sam wrote:
> >I wonder if you can recall what was lacking in the XK system? It
> >certainly was not an array of finders, screens, diopters, bulk film
> >back, intravalometer, battery packs, motor drive, macro tubes,
> >bellows,  copy stand, or lenses from fish-eye to 500mm. Here is an
> >early system map to help you remember:


--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


Replies: Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Reply from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
In reply to: Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from leicaman at sympatico.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)