Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: sam at osheaven.net (Sam)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:19 2004
References: <BC7E56F2.1684E%telyt@earthlink.net> <8CE9C597-7897-11D8-BD2C-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

You're right. The brochure shows a 1600mm lens. Makes me wish I had my 
XK back again.

Sam S



John Collier wrote:

> The longest tele was 1600 which was a mirror lens as was the more  
> readily available Minolta 800. I do not think many R and V mount  
> 800/6.3s were made never mind Minolta mount ones. Source:
>
> http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/minoltaxk/coverxk/ 
> fout6xk.jpg
>
> I cannot comment on the rest of the discussion except to say that  
> Henning knows his stuff.
>
> John Collier
>
>
> On Mar 17, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Doug Herr wrote:
>
>> Correction, Sam.  Lenses to at least *800* mm.  See the Leitz 800  
>> f/6.3? ;-)
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)