Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:19 2004
References: <BC7E56F2.1684E%telyt@earthlink.net>

The longest tele was 1600 which was a mirror lens as was the more  
readily available Minolta 800. I do not think many R and V mount  
800/6.3s were made never mind Minolta mount ones. Source:

http://mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/minoltaxk/coverxk/ 
fout6xk.jpg

I cannot comment on the rest of the discussion except to say that  
Henning knows his stuff.

John Collier


On Mar 17, 2004, at 8:26 PM, Doug Herr wrote:

> Correction, Sam.  Lenses to at least *800* mm.  See the Leitz 800  
> f/6.3? ;-)

--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


Replies: Reply from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Doug Herr) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)