Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: sam at osheaven.net (Sam)
Date: Sat Sep 4 06:33:18 2004
References: <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <A5DEF66C-77D9-11D8-9214-000A95CD9BF8@mac.com> <4057F0C4.2040707@osheaven.net> <3.0.6.32.20040317115152.008819e0@POP6.sympatico.ca> <5.2.0.9.2.20040317153435.01175e98@mail.infoave.net>

There is always one person who makes me put my foot in my mouth  :)

I know all three lenses and they are all worthy of being put to digital 
use. Pricing of the digital Minolta 7 is up in the air, but I hope they 
can offer a tasty price point when it comes out.

Sam s



Tina Manley wrote:

> At 03:15 PM 3/17/2004 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> I say this with the greatest respect for the talents of the 
>> professional photographers here, if not their courage to be innovative.
>>
>> Sam S
>
>
> I started with Minolta's because I couldn't afford Leica anything!  I 
> still have my Maxxums and a lot of good lenses.  The earliest color 
> photos on my web site were taken with Minolta's.  If their digital is 
> cheap enough, I'll get it to make use of my Minolta lenses. I have a 
> 200/2.8, an 80/1.4, and 16 fish-eye that are really nice.
>
> Tina
>
>
> Tina Manley, ASMP
> www.tinamanley.com
>
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


In reply to: Message from leicaman at sympatico.ca (Dan C) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from sam at osheaven.net (Sam) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from attinasi at mac.com (Marc Attinasi) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples)