Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would say they were being over cautious. We had an exhibition of his
prints here in Cedar Rapids 2 years ago and they were very well lit. A
superb show with several of the prints in several renditions that he had
made over the years. I would complain and see if they would upgrade their
lighting for the remainder of the exhibit.
Gene
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
| | "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com> |
| | Sent by: |
| | lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic|
| | a-users.org |
| | |
| | |
| | 07/26/2004 05:16 PM |
| | Please respond to Leica Users Group |
| | |
|---------+-------------------------------------------------------->
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|
|
| To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org>
|
| cc:
|
| Subject: [Leica] OT Ansel Adams exhibition
|
>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Our local art museum is featuring an Ansel Adams print exhibit. It was
disappointing.
The prints were illuminated with small spots or track-lights emitting a
soft
orange glow. To my (aging) eyes, the exhibition was wasted. All the
famous
tonality and subtle gradations were not visible to me under that
illumination. When I gently mentioned this to the docent, she replied that
"they" were being cautious, since "they" didn't wish to damage the prints
with stronger light.
As I left the exhibit, very dissatisfied, I wondered what good is a
masterful black-and-white print, if no one can see it.
Question: Is this the norm for exhibition of such original prints, or are
my local museum keepers off base? These were all b/w prints.
Thanks.............Julian
_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information