Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I would say they were being over cautious. We had an exhibition of his prints here in Cedar Rapids 2 years ago and they were very well lit. A superb show with several of the prints in several renditions that he had made over the years. I would complain and see if they would upgrade their lighting for the remainder of the exhibit. Gene |---------+--------------------------------------------------------> | | "Julian Koplen" <jkoplen@mindspring.com> | | | Sent by: | | | lug-bounces+grduprey=rockwellcollins.com@leic| | | a-users.org | | | | | | | | | 07/26/2004 05:16 PM | | | Please respond to Leica Users Group | | | | |---------+--------------------------------------------------------> >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| | | | To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> | | cc: | | Subject: [Leica] OT Ansel Adams exhibition | >----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| Our local art museum is featuring an Ansel Adams print exhibit. It was disappointing. The prints were illuminated with small spots or track-lights emitting a soft orange glow. To my (aging) eyes, the exhibition was wasted. All the famous tonality and subtle gradations were not visible to me under that illumination. When I gently mentioned this to the docent, she replied that "they" were being cautious, since "they" didn't wish to damage the prints with stronger light. As I left the exhibit, very dissatisfied, I wondered what good is a masterful black-and-white print, if no one can see it. Question: Is this the norm for exhibition of such original prints, or are my local museum keepers off base? These were all b/w prints. Thanks.............Julian _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information