Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Nathan's Canon (WAS: [Leica] PAWS 27 and 28)
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Sun Jul 18 09:39:29 2004
References: <000101c46cc9$b7238080$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4> <40FA990C.70308@chello.nl> <7FD6FBE7-D8D7-11D8-AE62-003065EF0D36@charter.net>

Hi Leo,

Since I have never used any Canon or Nikon in my life, I am agnostic as 
far as the religious wars between these two brands. What did clinch it 
for me, however, was that there is no R-to-Nikon adapter, thus 
precluding the use of my R lenses on the DSLR.

Nathan

leo wesson wrote:

> Nathan,
> 
> Don't rule out the Nikon D70.  Much better battery life, better files 
> (my opinion), less shutter lag .  I am used to a
> Canon system, but I prefer this Nikon to the Canon Digitals.  It's got 
> problems, auto-focus sucks (to a canon user) and all the dials move the 
> wrong way (to a canon user)!
> 
> Not sure if there is an R to Nikon adapter...
> 
> Leo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 30 868 671
General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com



Replies: Reply from leowesson at charter.net (leo wesson) (Nathan's Canon (WAS: [Leica] PAWS 27 and 28))
In reply to: Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) (Nathan's Canon (WAS: [Leica] PAWS 27 and 28))
Message from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) (Nathan's Canon (WAS: [Leica] PAWS 27 and 28))
Message from leowesson at charter.net (leo wesson) (Nathan's Canon (WAS: [Leica] PAWS 27 and 28))