Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Analog v. Digital
From: rclark01 at comcast.net (Robert Clark)
Date: Thu Jul 15 07:23:34 2004
References: <BD1C599A.538F%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

Wow...now that is a neat look at the past to see what the thinking was 
10 years ago on digital....they'll be saying the same think about our 
Canons and Nikons of today in 2014!  Thanks for posting the link.

Robert Clark
Lancaster, PA

Philippe Orlent wrote:

>Apple Quicktake here. At that time, it was a miracle :)
>
>http://www.epi-centre.com/reports/9403cdi.html
>
>---
>
>  
>
>>From: "Felix Lopez de Maturana" <fmaturana@euskalnet.net>
>>Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
>>Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 15:45:35 +0200
>>To: <lug@leica-users.org>
>>Subject: [Leica] Re: Analog v. Digital
>>
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Anyone here recall the old Sony Mavica's?   They were analog.
>>>
>>>-dan c.
>>>      
>>>
>>Dan
>>
>>I still own a Canon ION who recorded the pictures in a small disk that you
>>can see in a TV or monitor. It still works, like every of my cameras, but
>>only with external energy as the battery was dead long ago and Canon cannot
>>supply me a new battery. This was my first camera without film. Pictures
>>were horrible.
>>
>>Regards
>>
>>Felix
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Leica Users Group.
>>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>>
>>    
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>  
>

In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Analog v. Digital)