Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digilux invisibility. :-(
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Fri Jul 2 15:35:00 2004
References: <003301c45f79$e020bd20$6401a8c0@ccapr.com> <40E44213.8080202@chello.nl> <054601c46072$e9165670$0200a8c0@Desk>
 
Totally unubtrusive and FAST--I did not realize he had taken the picture 
in question until I saw it on the screen later that day.

Nathan

robertmeier@usjet.net wrote:
> Nathan,
> 
> So, HOW did he behave??
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
> 
>>It was all in the way he behaved, as B.D. says.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands
Mobile: +31 6 30 868 671
General photography: http://www.nathanfoto.com
Seville photography: http://www.fotosevilla.com
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Digilux invisibility. :-()
Message from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] Digilux invisibility. :-()
Message from robertmeier at usjet.net (robertmeier@usjet.net) ([Leica] Digilux invisibility. :-()