Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good morning; I was discussing this issue with my spouse and she has kindly offered to help (for a fee) those students who need writing or editing help or instruction. Jeny has a PHD in Fine Arts Education, Masters in Curriculum & Inst. and BA in Psychology. She has taught arts and writing to students from K-12 through graduate school, and tutored athletes who are at the university with less than an adequate prepatory education. Jeny is strongly against open admissions policies at colleges and universities and feels admitted students should have a basic and competent knowledge of language and writing to be admitted. It should not be the responsibility of professors/teachers in specialities to provide a gounding in basic reading/writing/math/science skills to students at college level. She related it to trying to teach commercial photography to someone who has never picked up or used a camera. She does workshops in integrating the arts (art, music, theatre, dance) in classrooms to teachers who have never experienced an art form! (She also knows how to document a situation with photography/video). Jeny Stoesz can be reached via email at: jstoesz at wyoming.com Don said: Sorry for the rant, but if these 18 year olds are being admitted to university; shouldn't they be able to string a few words together coherently? Perhaps it wouldn't be too much to require basic communication abilities before admission. My mother taught at the graduate level and every semester flunked out a few who couldn't/wouldn't write the required papers in the format provided the first session. I can still hear her on the phone to the Provost explaining that if a student could not follow a basic style requirement at the graduate level she saw no reason to provide a passing grade, and explaining it again, and again. Don dorysrus@mindspring.com Adam said: My engineering education dates from the early 1980s, but at UC Davis at least writing reports, GOOD reports that people could understand and which were literate, was a part of the general engineering curriculum that all engineers were required to take. The University also had entrance tests to discern who could actually write an essay in English that someone might, should they read it, have a shot at understanding. I used to carpool with one of the specialists who taught that course and the amount of understanding she brought to her course was well beyond what a vast majority of the engineering faculty had at their disposal. Teaching writing and composition is a specialized field, just like teaching circuit design, chemistry or any other field. It seems natural to me to let those who studied how to do it actually do the job they studied for. On the other hand the demand for well-written reports and essays in the sciences and in engineering seems even more crucial now than it ever has. But in an era where some elementary curricula are designed around using Power Point (shuddering) I wonder how well we're going to be doing a decade from now. Adam Jeffery said: > I have tried to push "writing across the curriculum" at three different > colleges, and each attempt has invoked cries of "academic freedom" being > violated. The invention of the scantron hasn't helped our cause either. > > Jeffery Smith > New Orleans, LA _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group