Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/20

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Port of Oakland
From: s.dimitrov at charter.net (Slobodan Dimitrov)
Date: Sun Jun 20 20:16:32 2004
 
It's also a real property grinder.
S. Dimitrov


> From: "Oliver" <oliverbryk@iqmail.net>
> Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:29:12 -0700
> To: "Users Group Leica" <lug@leica-users.org>
> Subject: [Leica] Port of Oakland
> 
> Slobodan wrote:"Well, compared to the LA/LB port combination, it's tiny."
> 
> No argument there, Slobodan. Here are some recent data:
> Oakland Container Volume 1,923,104 TEU (twenty-foot equivalent units)
> Los Angeles Container Volume 7,178,940 TEU
> Long Beach Container Volume 4,658,124 TEU
> Portland Container Volume: 255,745 TEU
> Tacoma Container Volume 1,470,000 TEU
> Seattle Container Volume: 1,486,465
> Port Hueneme Container Volume 5,000 TEU
> Port of San Diego Container Volume 10,000 TEU
> Oliver Bryk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
In reply to: Message from oliverbryk at iqmail.net (Oliver) ([Leica] Port of Oakland)