Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/06/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]The numbers I've told to stay away from are anything below 1,632,551. That would make it above 1983 vintage. S. Dimitrov > From: "Bill Grimwood" <bill@grimwood.net> > Reply-To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:56:42 -0500 > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] which R to avoid > > I used to own an R4 with the first two digits of 15 so some were made with > numbers below 1,600,000 > > Bill Grimwood > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Douglas Herr" <telyt@earthlink.net> > To: "Leica Users Group" <lug@leica-users.org> > Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 3:19 PM > Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: [Leica] which R to avoid > > >> Thinkofcole@aol.com wrote: >> >>> While I stick to range finder, my notes say to avoid the R4 and the R4S >>> below Serial No. 1,600,000. >> >> All R4s bodies have a serial number above 1,600,000. >> >> >> Doug Herr >> Birdman of Sacramento >> http://www.wildlightphoto.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Leica Users Group. >> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information