Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On 5/28/04 <dpost@triad.rr.com (Dan Post)> thoughtfully wrote: >The thing that struck me, aside from the stupidity of the guards, was the >part of the article about congress limiting who and what could be >photographed. Not only is this a clear intrusion on the tenth amendment, but >it seems like a start up the 'slippery slope' of abridging the first >amendment. So far, street photographers are banned from taking shot in and >around subways, as I understand, and possibly in other venues of public >transportation. Who is to say that there might not be a ban on photographing >interesting looking people since the attention might be construed as >something sinister- photographing ugly people might hurt their self esteem, >or photographing people eating might cause some mental trauma in the >'victims'. The bill in question regarding photography is in large part due to "up-skirting" and the inappropriate use of digital images from cell phones. I understand the concern. While it may seem like a pllot from Fred Ritchin's perspective it does seem like a protection, and a source of remedy for the drooling idiots who are making money out of these images right now. I'll leave you to google to discover how. I just LOVE american pop culture. AB