Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It's kind of interesting - I have been trying to figure out the "gestalt" of what looks "analog" and what looks "digital" - the best way that I can distinguish it is that film has better acutance; that it has a naturally-sharpened look to it. Digital does not. But if you use 100-speed color film, there is little difference to see (unless you use Frontier processing, which sharpens both the image and the grain in the CDs they give you). Cheers Dante On May 16, 2004, at 7:57 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote: > I don't know Dante, and can't articulate it Some photos just look > digital to me. > > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > P.S. I agree with Phong that you seem to relate well to your models. > > > Dante Stella wrote: > >> Thanks... what made you think digital? >> Dante >> On May 16, 2004, at 5:14 PM, Jim Hemenway wrote: >>> Dante: >>> >>> Well done, a very nice portrait... digital? >>> http://www.dantestella.com/past/past46.html >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Leica Users Group. > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > ____________ Dante Stella http://www.dantestella.com