Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT
From: hlritter at mindspring.com (Howard L Ritter, Jr)
Date: Mon May 17 16:22:25 2004
References: <005501c43c50$6bf7aae0$6701a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
Actually, it IS the cart (figuratively speaking; the cart's driver
literally) that decides where the horse should pull it, no?

;-)

--howard


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 4:49 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -
OT


> Not to start a flame war, but it seems to be this is letting the cart
> decide where the horse should pull it. If one prefers Tri-X to Delta
> 400, figure out how best to scan it, don't just switch films because the
> other "scans better." I have to say, and I think have before, that I
> don't get the complaints about scanning tri-x.....
>
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)
 In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)