Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I use VueScan. It's gotten better results out of my Leica negs and slides than the native software of either my former Nikon LS-2000 or my current Canon FS-4000. But what Tina and others point out is quite true--Vuescan is not intuitive. What it does for you is worth its weight in *gold.* But the user interface is expertware (or geekware, if you prefer). I've gotten to the point with Vuescan where I usually know what to do. But when I switch films, upgrade to a new version, or just haven't used it for a few days, I often blow the first scan because I forgot to go to the third menu on the right and change Parameter X from "obscure" to "opaque." The CanonScan application is very intuitive, and the infrared clean is a little more effective. But unfortunately, it works slower than VueScan, and always ends up losing a bit of both highlight and shadow detail. Hard and contrasty, like 4x6 prints from the drugstore. Can someone tell me how to get (with Canonscan) the "flat" Vuescan-like scans where all none of the dynamic range is thrown away? If I ever figure this out, I'd happily use the Canonscan software for all but the hardest scans. But so far, Vuescan wins almost every time. --Peter At 06:15 PM 5/13/04 -0700, you wrote: >I agree with Adam. Nikon does everything I want it to. Silverfast is >grossly overpriced for what it does. Vuescan is not intuitive at all and >comes with no hints on how to make it work. I find Nikon's latest software >to be great - all you are doing is scanning. It's much better to do any >adjusting in PhotoShop anyway. > >Tina