Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/12
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 2:30 PM -0400 5/12/04, Tina Manley wrote: >At 09:25 AM 5/12/2004 -0400, you wrote: > >>Well said Henning. >>I am staunchly on your side and Philippe's, >>and opposite of B.D., Mark, and others'. >>To say that the image in itself looses its power >>because it is staged, (which it is not) is like >>saying a story is not good because it is fiction. >>Do you guys only watch movies "based on a true >>story" ? > >But, Phong, to write fiction and pass it off as true would be just >as wrong as staging a documentary photograph. That's how several >journalists have gotten in trouble lately. There should be a >definite line between truth and fiction in writing just as there >should be between staged and documentary photographs. > >Tina I fully agree. I don't necessarily care whether a photo is staged or not (depends on circumstances, as does almost everything) but I want to be informed whether it was or not. In the case of the Capa photo, it would in my opinion be just as powerful, but in a somewhat different way, had it been staged. -- * Henning J. Wulff /|\ Wulff Photography & Design /###\ mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com |[ ]| http://www.archiphoto.com