Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Message: 6 > Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 17:47:34 +0200 > From: "Douglas M. Sharp" <DouglasMSharp@netscape.net> > Subject: Re: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not. > To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org> > Message-ID: <409BAF96.90408@netscape.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > << Snip>> > > Douglas > > BTW to those of us out there who took the plunge and bought the R8 or 9 > -- what real advantages did you get from it ? how often do you use its > extra functions ? do you feel that it's helping you to record better > images ? I went from Rollei SL-35 (30 years) to Leica R4 (2 years) now to R8 (2 years) Gained very accurate metering in any mode I want. Exceptionally bright viewfinder with diopter correction. Fits like a glove in my hand. Not sure what "extra features" is has aside from improvements from my older cameras. Just the basics and that is what I like about it. Well, the +/- controls are convenient to reach. Don't have to look away from my view. Every control is right where an old camera buff wants them to be. I have used the flash metering mode on some older flashes when I scatter them around with slaves. That's cool, but not used very often my me. Disadvantages: WEIGHT. Need an R9 to carry on long walks/hike. But then again, the lenses weigh so much perhaps I wouldn't notice the difference in the body weight when carting along 3 or 4 lenses. Aram