Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.
From: frank.dernie at btinternet.com (FRANK DERNIE)
Date: Fri May 7 00:07:28 2004

I have an extensive EOS system and a limited R system.
I find the R8 by far the most ergonomic and logical
reflex body I have ever used, though i consider it
ugly. The control layout and viewfinder are lightyears
ahead of and EOS1n. I OTOH find the lenses a bit pricy
for an amateur. I am waiting to see what I personally
think of the digi back before deciding whether to buy
it or an EOS 1Ds.
Frank

--- Felix Lopez de Maturana <fmaturana@euskalnet.net>
wrote: > 
> >The F5's exposure system is completely different,
> although to be honest, I
> >don't find the results really any better than the
> F90's or F4's, or, from
> >what I have seen, the R8 or 9's. The overexposure
> of the FA is long gone.
> 
> 
> Henning
> 
> I've used the Nikon FA with very good results with
> Velvia film not long ago.
> My R8 meters perfectly as far as, like I am, you are
> used to a center
> weighted meter, more if 40/60 as, approximately, the
> Nikon F3, but the Nikon
> F5 metering concept is really fool-proof. You don't
> need calculate anything
> and photographs are systematically dead on. I have
> photographed many
> thousands with the F5 and the number mistakes are
> less than my hands
> fingers. 
> 
> I still believe that R8 is not a great camera but
> his lenses, most of them,
> are. 
> 
> Felix
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for
> more information 

In reply to: Message from fmaturana at euskalnet.net (Felix Lopez de Maturana) ([Leica] Ten years behind? I think not.)