Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 5/1/04 6:04:42 PM, lug-request@leica-users.org writes: > > All I'm trying to say - nothing will last forever even if properly stored. > and most things will deteriorate because they won't be properly stored. and > the technology for accessing "whatever" will become harder and harder to save > and migrate - especially if you haven't kept up with the migration in a steady > way. > if you really want your images to last, figure out a way to put them on clay. Clay tablets have been found from ancient mesopotamian civilizations dating back to several th ousand years BC. Next best? Papyrus. Many ancient examples also exist. Next Best? Good quality paper. 100 percent Cotton bond paper -- which is what photo paper is -- holds up extremely well despite more than 170 years of history, and counting. My sister, a chemist in the conservation department of the Detroit Institute of Arts, soon to be working at the Getty in LA (bragging, sure, but she knows her stuff) says if you really really want anything to last, those are your best bets. As nearly chemically inert as possible, as easily accessible as possible. Paper that is a thousand years old is still around, check out your local museum. Gutenberg Bible anyone? All your technological solutions that come up in these debates usually fail on that second point -- it ain't archival if you can't access it, and nothing is more accessable than an image on a piece of paper. An actual image is what all you digital technocrats are trying to duplicate and "preserve"with your dvd and cd and what not solutions, but those are all passing fancies, ifyou look at the big picture. My old Edison records (1920s) are more playable than a digital image stored on techcnology only 30 years old. Paper is the more durable, too. In the 1870s newspapers in Utah were printed on rag paper because what with this being a desert and all, rag cotton was easier to find than wood pulp. I have some of those papers in my collection and they are still flexible, readable, slightly aged because of astonishingly poor storage conditions, but still holding up marvelously, not brittle at all like wood pulp paper. so, want your images to last? Dig out the darkroom trays. ctrentelman