Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]On Sunday, April 18, 2004 Thomas Pastorello thoughtfully wrote: > Check out this interesting article, in the Sunday >NY Times Art Section, on print size and super sizing. > >http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/18/arts/design/18GEFT.html > > What are the largest prints you make? What >criteria do you use to determine the right print size >for a given image? > > Thanks for any insights. Tom I didn't find the article very interesting actually. "Prints are getting bigger. They were smaller." I think most of my prints are 11 x 16. (which is what my Epson 2200 prints.) That's for my use. I don't like to stand real close to photographs so I like them big enough that I can step back. Expense is an issue in framing for some people so 8 x 10 is good. I know some folks like portraits that are 8 x 10 or smaller. I like them a bit larger. I virtually never print smaller than 8 x 10. Adam