[Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason

[lea at whinydogpress.com (lea)]

All right, all right...so I hit the wrong number already.

I have to say, I'm very impressed with the numbers of men who caught
that mistake. My bad!

:o)

Lea

----- Original Message -----
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
To: "'Leica Users Group'" <lug@leica-users.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 8:32 AM
Subject: RE: [Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason


> Great project, Lea...But I have one question....45 weeks? 48 Weeks?
Was
> this the longest human pregnancy on record? :-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org
> [mailto:lug-bounces+bdcolen=earthlink.net@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of
> Steve Barbour
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2004 9:17 PM
> To: Leica Users Group
> Subject: Re: [Leica] PAM (photo a month)...for good reason
>
>
>
>
> lea wrote:
>
> > Last April my little and only sister told me she and her husband
were
> > expecting (their first) and I asked if I might chronicle her
pregnancy
>
> > via photographs. She was delighted and we got down to business.
> >
> > Two days after telling me, Shannon and Jason came to my studio and
we
> > began photographing. I shot my sister every month up until 45 weeks
>
> how long was this pregnancy ??   :-)
>   then
> > I began photographing her every week until she delivered...she went
2
> > weeks over (poor dear). This work was done entirely with my Leica
in
> > black and white (except for December which they requested to have in
> > color so I used digital) in an assortment of places...the studio,
the
> > baby's nursery, their home, outside...wherever the mood struck us to
> > go. Four of the sessions included Jason, the bulk of them did not.
> > Some of the work was nude, most was not. It is an amazing journal of
> > her growth and body change ending in the arrival of Rachel Diane.
> >
> > To see a small sample of the images from this series click here...
> > http://www.whinydogpress.com/familyi.html
> > The first shot was taken 2 days after they found out she was
pregnant
> > The second shot was taken at 48 weeks
>
> nope...please recalculate....it just seemed that long.
>
> > The third shot was taken when Rachel was 5 days old.
> >
>
> these  three make a wonderful series....
>
> Steve
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>