Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted
From: n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman)
Date: Mon Apr 12 21:46:06 2004
References: <009b01c420c4$a77ecb40$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>
 
Not me, B.D., I don't want any histograms or anything else. My ideal
digital camera would be just like an M, with a pure, optical,
unadulterated viewfinder. All the electronic info can be relegated to
the LCD.

Nathan

"B. D. Colen" wrote:
> 
> I have to say that I'm amused by the fact that on the one hand, people
> talking about wanting a camera that works like an M, doesn't have all
> the digifoldarol, etc. etc., and on the other someone's asking for a
> histogram superimposed on the viewfinder - talking about digifoldarol
> and not destroying the entire idea of that bright, clear, uncluttered
> viewfinder....:-)
> 

-- 
Nathan Wajsman
Almere, The Netherlands

e-mail: n.wajsman@chello.nl
Mobile: +31 630 868 671

http://www.nathanfoto.com/index.html
Replies: Reply from abridge at mac.com (Adam Bridge) ([Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] PART 4: of Digilux 2.... THE FUN PART! :-))
 In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Pt Three of Digilux 2 posted)