Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/04/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs. Fuji Neopan SS 100
From: ericm at pobox.com (Eric)
Date: Sun Apr 11 19:12:24 2004
References: <ocoi701nnuc4e4s4g53h4mlud8b4q5qrq0@4ax.com> <000501c41ff9$682e5080$7e6b0e44@newukolbqveo9i>
 
Jeffery:

>The Acros costs twice as much. There's gotta be some difference.

The Acros is 3.69 vs. 1.99 for the SS.

But, the US Neopan 400 is 3.99 compared to 2.49 for the import that's the
same stuff.

So the price difference didn't seem to be a big deal to me.  I tried a few
rolls of the import 400, and as far as I can tell, it's the same quality.
So I felt safe getting the import 100.  Oh, well.  It was cheap.  $40 for 20
rolls.  I don't use much 100, anyway.  If it's that bad, I can probably give
it away to somebody.  :)

Thanks for the added info, Tom & Nathan!

--
Eric
http://canid.com/
Replies: Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Re: Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs. Fuji Neopan SS 100)
 In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs. Fuji Neopan SS 100)
Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Fuji Neopan Acros 100 vs. Fuji Neopan SS 100)