Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Toning in Photoshop: PAW 13
From: aaron.sandler at duke.edu (Aaron Sandler)
Date: Mon Mar 29 11:07:07 2004

Chris,

If you click on the word "guidance" in my little paragraph of text under 
the first photo, you will be taken to:

http://www.computer-darkroom.com./tutorials/tutorial_2_1.htm

That article by Ian Lyons is on "Monochrome from Colour," so I skipped 
steps 1 and 2 and started with converting my monochrome image into RGB, and 
then picked up with step 3 in the tutorial.  I haven't printed any of them 
out yet, but I'm pretty pleased with the on-screen results.

Have fun,
Aaron


At 01:39 PM 3/29/2004, you wrote:
>The split toning is just perfect for my tastes.  The tones in the darker 
>areas work well when the lighter areas aren't as affected. Like the face 
>and the circles, gives the photo greater Pop.  CI seems to always be the 
>biggest factor with toning, in my own work it rarely works with images 
>like the third.
>
>Is there a reference I could use to learn how to split tone?  Or a good PS 
>reference for B&W toning?
>
>Chris Saganich
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+saganicc=mskcc.org@leica-users.org 
>[mailto:lug-bounces+saganicc=mskcc.org@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Aaron 
>Sandler
>Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 12:04 PM
>To: lug@leica-users.org
>Subject: [Leica] Toning in Photoshop: PAW 13
>
>Hi Folks,
>
>In preparation for printing with my new digital darkroom, I have been
>experimenting with "toning" B&W photos in photoshop.  For this week's PAW,
>I selected a "split-toned" version of a photo I took recently:
>
>http://www.duke.edu/~ajs2/PAW/2004_13/index.html
>
>If you scroll down, you'll see 2 other versions of this shot, as well as
>another new photo and one from earlier this year, each in three variations.
>
>I'm leaning toward the split-toned versions, but I'm curious what y'all
>think?  Too much?  Too little?  On the right track?  Terribly off-base?
>
>Your thoughts would be much appreciated,
>Aaron