Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 13:34:00 -0500

That's fine - so add the $350-300. ;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Sam Krneta
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:41 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples


I think the Digilux and the 5060 are two different sensor sizes. The
5060 being smaller yet. The Dlux has the 2/3 sensor.

Sam Krneta

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D.
Colen
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:59 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples

Very interesting review. The problem is, it seems to me, that to say
that it is the best small sensor camera is damning with faint praise -
because it is priced higher than the Canon 10D, Digital Rebel, and Nikon
D100, and priced on a part with the Olympus E-1. If it was priced down
with the Olympus C5060, which is where is should be priced, or perhaps
if it was priced a few hundred above that, then saying that it's the
best small sensor camera would mean allot more.

Also, even the RAW file noise at 400 iso is, for me simply unacceptable.
And to wait 6 seconds plus between shots to end up with that kind of
noise is a joke - which one has to do because the jpg noise is awful.

But those photos are quite cool. ;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of GREG
LORENZO
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 11:01 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples


As posted previously Part 1 of this review can be found here:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/leica-digilux2-part1.s
html

Regards,

Greg

- ----- Original Message -----
From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com>
Date: Monday, March 15, 2004 4:30 pm
Subject: [Leica] Digilux 2 review pt posted - many samples

> It's worth looking at and reading about at:
> 
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/leica-digilux2-
> part2.shtml
> Adam
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-
> users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html