Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
From: "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 20:13:35 -0500

Well, Simon, the upscaled Pixel crop is 17 meg, so that is a bit
impractical. It is, btw, anything but soft - which is why I didn't
sharpen it.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of animal
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 6:10 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa


With the file size displayed I fail to see your point B.D. still it
looks a bit soft .Would you share a larger version or an actual pixel
crop? simon jessurun


> :-)
> Speaking of disclaimers....Enough of the film v digital bs. Go look at

> http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-62369.html
> And
> http://www.leica-gallery.net/bdcolen/image-62368.html
> The image was shot at 200 iso, using the Olympus E-1 with the 50 macro

> f 2 - 100 mm 35 mm equiv - set at f 2.5. The original file is 14.7 
> meg. The cropped image, which is what, about 1/3 of the original, was 
> upsized using nothing but photoshop, setting it for 110% each time, 
> until I had a 17 meg file of the cropped area. Then I set my size to 
> 8x5 at 72 dpi, did a similar, slight dodge of the boy's and father's 
> face on each image, put borders on them, and uploaded them with NO 
> sharpening. And btw, the camera is set to not sharpen.
>
> So if you want to use film, more power to you. If not... :-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jeffery 
> Smith
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 5:26 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
>
>
> BD
>
> Attach a wav file with that really fast-talking dude who gives all the

> disclaimers before used car ads on the radio. [I hope he isn't only 
> down here).
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D. 
> Colen
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 4:02 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
>
> Yup. But Phong, do you want a disclaimer with every friggin' post? I 
> hardly make a secret of my Olympus ties...:-)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Daniel 
> Ridings
> Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2004 12:57 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa
>
>
> I've got some ties from various universities. I suspect BD does too :)
>
> The only tie I have with Olympus is that I bought one for my wife a 
> few years back and it keeps delivering pictures of incredible quality 
> (always with Fujicolor 800 in it).
>
> Anyway, when something costs 1/3 as much and is still comparable if 
> not outright better, then it must feel _good_ to have ties to the 
> better alternative. Like choosing the right horse to bet on :)
>
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Phong wrote:
>
> > There you go again B.D..
> > You forgot to mention your Olympus ties.
> > Bad, B.D., bad.
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > - Phong
> >
> > [ I am waiting for a Rabiner tie-in]
> >
> >
> > B. D. Colen wrote:
> > >
> > > And costs less than 1/3 of what an D2 does... :-)
> > >
> > Daniel Ridings wrote:
> > >
> > > The Olympus C-5050 is a little faster :) (f1.8)
> > >
> > > Daniel
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see 
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Steve Gandy's update on the digital bessa)