Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]No it is not "cheating" and anyone who says it is ought to be trashed. The word cheating implies something fraudulent. Fraud against whom? Had I been printing the negative in my darkroom, I would have certainly burned in the background. The world is too full of real problems to become obsessive-compulsive about Photo Shop manipulations. Sam S Keith R. Wessel wrote: >I am putting up my efforts for weeks 10 and 11. In week 10 I took a >photograph that I particularly liked at my associates wedding reception. >But, as I was looking at it I didn't like all of the clutter in the >background. > >see http://wesselphoto.com/paw/10/slides/72_5A_0229.html > >so I used PhotoShop and took out the clutter. > >see > >http://wesselphoto.com/paw/10/slides/altered.html > >Is that cheating? Sure would not have tried this in the darkroom. Maybe I >should check the archives -- I suspect there has been a previous debate. > >Other new ones: > >http://wesselphoto.com/paw/10/index.html > >http://wesselphoto.com/paw/11/index.html > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html