Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Portra and TCN
From: "Higa Isaku" <isakuhiga@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 15:14:35 -0500

My experience is that if you print (i.e. chemical process),  Portra seems 
to prints better on color paper than TCN.

I heard that Portra supposed to scan better than TCN but I have not noticed 
much of a difference.

Isaku


>From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com>
>Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: [Leica] Portra and TCN
>Date: Tue,  9 Mar 2004 12:43:17 -0700
>
>I've only been shooting TCN which scans wonderfully well. I use it for 
those
>times when I either can't process or own film or don't want to mess with 
it,
>although I've slipped into doing portraiture with TCN and I like very much 
what
>it does for skin tones.
>
>So what's the difference between them? Besides Portra being more 
expensive. Is
>there any reason to consider it?
>
>For my purposes I scan almost everything and print to piezography or 2200.
>
>Adam
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

_________________________________________________________________
$BM'C#$H(B24$B;~4V%[%C%H%i%$%s!V(BMSN $B%a%C%;%s%8%c!<!W!":#$9$0%@%&%s%m!<%I!*(B 
http://messenger.msn.co.jp 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Christopher Williams" <leicachris@worldnet.att.net> (Re: [Leica] Portra and TCN)