Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 short hands-on test
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 18:55:03 -0800
References: <01a701c400b9$dbc30f40$6401a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E>

BD

Not really, but are the electronics and software the same.  I don't
give a FRA about red dots, usw.

jerry

"B. D. Colen" wrote:

> Jerry asked of the Digi2 ---
> Exactly how does this camera compare with the Panasonic equivalent,
> except for the red dot?
> ----
> It costs about $300 more...And, oh, ya, it has a red dot, silver trim,
> and an oh-so-very-slightly different body curves. Definitely worth $300
> more.
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jerry
> Lehrer
> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:06 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 short hands-on test
>
> LUGers
>
> Today I also had my first experience with this camera.  Our local dealer
> has a demonstrator Dig. 2, and I spent 30 minutes with it.  Quite
> versatile.  I can probably get it over a Sunday, but my computer can't
> handle it. (Windows 3.1, non pentium 386, 8meg RAM).
>
> I was impressed by how much cropping and sizing can be done in the
> camera, but maybe other cameras can do this.
>
> Jerry
>
> Leicajay@aol.com wrote:
>
> > My local dealer got a Digilux2 for a customer yesterday and I had the
> > chance to handle it while he was there to pick it up.  I was surprised
>
> > at the size, it is about 30% thicker (deeper) than an M camera, and
> > sized between a CL and an M but closer to an M (we had both for
> > comparison in the store).  It's also *heavy* for a non-DSLR, the
> > heaviest P&S digicam I've ever held.  Finish is really nice
> > pseudo-Leica, much nicer than the Miniluxes.  The lens (according to
> > the store owner, I forgot to verify this, sounds fishy) takes a 69mm
> > filter????  The electronic viewfinder is not as bad as ones I've seen
> > in the past (Minolta Dimage 7Hi, Nikon 5700) but it ain't no
> > rangefinder.  The zigzag built-in flash  has great features but a
> > complicated deployment that could be troublesome, time will tell.  The
>
> > manual-camera-type interface is a welcome relief from the multiple
> > pushbuttons, dials and LCD menus which must be memorized in order to
> > work other digicam P&S's.  The coverage of the le!
> !
> >  ns!
> >  is really a perfect range for the type of general snapshooting,
> travel-documentation, etc photography this camera will probably be used
> for by 90% of its (most likely very small # of) buyers and the extensive
> depth of field at even the "equivalent" 90mm end (actually 22.7mm) might
> be useful for that kind of shooting.  But if you like to emphasize a
> subject against an OOF background, forget it, it's impossible (well
> maybe there's a way to cheat and do it in Photoshop, I wouldn't know).
> Will I buy one:  in a word, no.  It's $350 more than a Canon 10D, which
> I *can* use selective DOF and a whole host of interchangeable lenses and
> which has a much larger chip.  At 5MP with a postage-stamp sized chip
> the Digilux 2 is already way behind the curve, as the latest digicam
> P&S's which cost a lot less are coming in at 8MP.  And with the
> Epson-Bessa M-mount digicam in the offing, and a real Leica M digital
> confirmed, I will wait.  The Digilux 2 looks and feels very nice, if it
> were u!
> !
> >  nd!
> > er $1000 I'd probably buy one, but not for $1850, no way.
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see
> > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 short hands-on test)