Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BD Not really, but are the electronics and software the same. I don't give a FRA about red dots, usw. jerry "B. D. Colen" wrote: > Jerry asked of the Digi2 --- > Exactly how does this camera compare with the Panasonic equivalent, > except for the red dot? > ---- > It costs about $300 more...And, oh, ya, it has a red dot, silver trim, > and an oh-so-very-slightly different body curves. Definitely worth $300 > more. > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jerry > Lehrer > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 6:06 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Digilux 2 short hands-on test > > LUGers > > Today I also had my first experience with this camera. Our local dealer > has a demonstrator Dig. 2, and I spent 30 minutes with it. Quite > versatile. I can probably get it over a Sunday, but my computer can't > handle it. (Windows 3.1, non pentium 386, 8meg RAM). > > I was impressed by how much cropping and sizing can be done in the > camera, but maybe other cameras can do this. > > Jerry > > Leicajay@aol.com wrote: > > > My local dealer got a Digilux2 for a customer yesterday and I had the > > chance to handle it while he was there to pick it up. I was surprised > > > at the size, it is about 30% thicker (deeper) than an M camera, and > > sized between a CL and an M but closer to an M (we had both for > > comparison in the store). It's also *heavy* for a non-DSLR, the > > heaviest P&S digicam I've ever held. Finish is really nice > > pseudo-Leica, much nicer than the Miniluxes. The lens (according to > > the store owner, I forgot to verify this, sounds fishy) takes a 69mm > > filter???? The electronic viewfinder is not as bad as ones I've seen > > in the past (Minolta Dimage 7Hi, Nikon 5700) but it ain't no > > rangefinder. The zigzag built-in flash has great features but a > > complicated deployment that could be troublesome, time will tell. The > > > manual-camera-type interface is a welcome relief from the multiple > > pushbuttons, dials and LCD menus which must be memorized in order to > > work other digicam P&S's. The coverage of the le! > ! > > ns! > > is really a perfect range for the type of general snapshooting, > travel-documentation, etc photography this camera will probably be used > for by 90% of its (most likely very small # of) buyers and the extensive > depth of field at even the "equivalent" 90mm end (actually 22.7mm) might > be useful for that kind of shooting. But if you like to emphasize a > subject against an OOF background, forget it, it's impossible (well > maybe there's a way to cheat and do it in Photoshop, I wouldn't know). > Will I buy one: in a word, no. It's $350 more than a Canon 10D, which > I *can* use selective DOF and a whole host of interchangeable lenses and > which has a much larger chip. At 5MP with a postage-stamp sized chip > the Digilux 2 is already way behind the curve, as the latest digicam > P&S's which cost a lot less are coming in at 8MP. And with the > Epson-Bessa M-mount digicam in the offing, and a real Leica M digital > confirmed, I will wait. The Digilux 2 looks and feels very nice, if it > were u! > ! > > nd! > > er $1000 I'd probably buy one, but not for $1850, no way. > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see > > http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html