Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I can understand that- though my last adverse encounter with "Depth of Field' was stepping into a hole while walking through a cow pasture and trying to avoid stepping in a 'land mine'. :o) When you get down to it- how many of us really think about DOF while we are snapping away? I usually have too much other data to process! Dan ( HOLD STILL, You little bugger)Post - ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Collier" <jbcollier@shaw.ca> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 10:21 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M and Cosina Digitals > I hereby publicly state that I refuse to enter into another DOF > discussion. Let the great unwashed wallow in their ignorance; I care > not. > > ;-) > > John Collier > > On Mar 2, 2004, at 8:02 AM, B. D. Colen wrote: > > > ....While the finger print and characteristics are > > great, and there are certainly some occassions when the depth of field > > would be good, it also means that you would have more depth of field > > wide open at the 52.5 focal length than you might want with a 50. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html