Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 20:53:02 +0100
References: <000001c3fdc8$c3e88d30$2602a8c0@DenHP> <BAY10-DAV23kOD2yhEO0000c094@hotmail.com> <008501c3fe86$c6e253e0$3c2bb2cd@dnai.com> <BAY4-DAV740X1Rmip5K0000265d@hotmail.com> <3.0.6.32.20040301105244.00835bb0@POP6.sympatico.ca>

Well these days it has
the highest quality
the lowest cost
and it,s fun to do
plus in theory at least the only constraint of the quality possible is the
size of the film
a 4 times as large film should be easier to get then a 4 times enlarged
sensor or not?

> But if the only way you can stay ahead of digital is going to large
format,
> why bother even trying?   What is this saying about the quality of
digital?
>
> -dan c.
>
> At 04:15 PM 01-03-04 +0100, animal wrote:
> >I sold my Pentax 6x7 and a few lenses and traded it for a much cheaper
Sinar
> >hybrid and some lenses.
> >I think if you want to stay ahead of the quality digital capture is going
to
> >offer within the next 3 years , you should go to large format equipment .
> >simon jessurun
> >amsterdam
> >
> >
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Tom Schofield" <leicaluvr@comcast.net> (RE: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)
Message from "eric" <leica_korenman@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)
Message from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)
Message from "David Rodgers" <davrodgers@msn.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)
Message from Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] OT: Darn quest for Image Quality... MF?)