Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Tina, I've seen some impressive output from the 2200. I'm in the market for a new printer and a new scanner. I was in Camera World of Oregon today and nearly bought a 2200. (CWO sure has changed. But that's another story.) I decided to wait to see what the 4000 looks like. I may also look for a refurbed 7600. Decisions, decisions! The only drawback I hear regarding the 2200 is the cost of inks. DaveR - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tina Manley" <images@InfoAve.Net> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 11:59 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: It's so easy.. > Dave - > > Have you tried the Epson 2200? The color will blow you away! I'm > scanning > my old Kodachromes (made with Leica's!) and printing them on the Epson > Smooth Fine Art paper and can't believe the quality I'm getting. > > > >I've never needed more than one cleaning cycle with the 3000. I don't > >know if it's the inks or the printer. > > I think it must be the printer. Jon Cone says the results from the 3000's > are very dependent on the individual printer. He's had good ones and bad > ones. I'm very lucky to have gotten two excellent ones that have never > had > a clog that couldn't be fixed with one cleaning cycle either. > > Tina > > Tina Manley, ASMP > www.tinamanley.com > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html