Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I thought the Panasonic was well received, perhaps even more so than the digilux 1. - -dan c. At 11:45 PM 19-02-04 -0800, Mark Rabiner wrote: >In the case of the Digilux I (as if it has that much to do with the Digilux >II) the software in the Panasonic did not cut the mustard. There lies the >rub. A mustard rub. Which could go either way. >The Leica was Liked. The Panasonic was panned. >And might have strangely cost more money than the Leica. - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html