Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital Bessa RF
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:31:33 +0100 (MET)
References: <000601c3f3d3$39bcf640$b2710e44@newukolbqveo9i>

Now there you guys go with all the criticism. Don't you know you have to
handle it first?

Then you can :)

Daniel


On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Jeffery Smith wrote:

> I agree. I really don't want my 21/2.8 Kobalux to be my "normal" lens.
>
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jim Laurel
> Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2004 12:09 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Bessa RF
>
> Six MP is plenty, but I've got no use for this thing with an APS size
> sensor.  I detest the 1.6x crop on the Canon 10D.  I say either do it
> right
> with a full frame sensor or don't bother at all.  I certainly won't be
> in
> the market for a crippled digital rangefinder.
>
> --Jim
>
>
> On 2/14/04 2:43 PM, "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com> wrote:
>
> > Here is Stephen Gandy's report from Photokina:
> > ==================================================================
> > officially the details of the camera will not be officially released
> > until March 11.   my guesses and observations are:
> >
> > Leica M mount
> > 6 megapixel digital chip
> > APS  size sensor
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Digital Bessa RF)
In reply to: Message from "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com> (RE: [Leica] Digital Bessa RF)