Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Well it didn't Dan and speculation will get us nowhere. The output quality from a 6 mp almost full frame chip (not those teeny ones) seems to be very good. It will not replace my slides but it would replace all my print work. It is the final result that counts not one step on the way there. If 6 mp is good enough now, it will be good enough forever. I NEVER print larger than 8 x 10 and very seldom do I even do that. How much wall space do you guys have? John Collier On Feb 10, 2004, at 1:08 PM, leicaman@sympatico.ca wrote: > But what kind of digital output would you be getting? If the Digital > M had come out at the same time as the Nikon D1, the output would have > been 2 or 3 mp at best. Would you be happy with that now, not even 5 > years later (the D1 was announced in June 1999)? > > -dan c. > > >> From: John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> >> >> If it took my lenses and had the M viewfinder, I would gladly pay >> three >> to four times the going rate. Heck they could throw away all the LCD >> display crap and just give me a viewfinder with digital output. >> >> On Feb 10, 2004, at 10:10 AM, leicaman@sympatico.ca wrote: >> >>> If Leica produces a wonderful full frame 6mp digital M camera, but >>> within a year or two, most of the other camera manufacturers are >>> making 10mp full frame cameras at a fraction of the cost of the >>> Leica, - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html